In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
9d
Peter Wildeford馃嚭馃嚫馃殌
@peterwildeford
路
9d
The conversation is a discussion about the timeline for achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The reply '@peterwildeford *too many' seems to be a lighthearted correction of a typo in the previous message ('to many' instead of 'too many'). The overall tone is informal and humorous, focusing on a common grammatical error rather than the substantive issue of AGI timelines.
- The statement does no harm and is lighthearted.聽[+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by correcting a typo in a humorous way.聽[+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a minor error without personal attacks.聽[+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.