Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
Global Government Affairs
@GlobalAffairs
·
143d
The statement expresses strong opposition to a Brazilian judge's ruling on global content removal, framing it as a threat to free speech. It calls for action from the U.S. government, urging the use of trade, aid, arms, and sanctions as leverage.
- The statement uses alarmist language, which may incite fear rather than promote understanding, slightly violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the aggressive tone could be seen as disrespectful, slightly violating the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote awareness about free speech issues, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding, but the tone is more combative than empathetic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement calls for action and dialogue but does so in a confrontational manner, which may hinder constructive criticism and dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.