Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -113
9/6/2025, 1:29:20 PM
X
In reply to:
Mike Benz
@MikeBenzCyber
·
143d
🚨 Red Alert, White House & State Department 🚨 The thing I’ve screamed they’d do is officially being done and only official state pressure brought by YOU 🫵 can stop it ‼️ Leverage everything: TRADE, AID, ARMS & SANCTIONS. This is the hill to die on, free speech is dead if not.
Global Government Affairs
@GlobalAffairs
·
143d
Last week, a Brazilian judge from Blumenau, Santa Catarina, ruled that removing content deemed unlawful under Brazilian law is not enough if limited to Brazil. The judge is now demanding the global removal of online content under threat of hefty fines for the platform. These

The statement by @MikeBenzCyber is a call to action against a Brazilian court ruling perceived as a threat to global free speech. The tone is urgent and alarmist, emphasizing the need for international pressure to counteract the ruling.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could incite action, potentially leading to harm, but it does not directly advocate violence. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding of the perceived threat to free speech, but the alarmist tone may hinder empathy and constructive dialogue.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement encourages action against a judicial decision, which could be seen as a personal attack on the Brazilian judiciary rather than engaging in constructive criticism. [-1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to rally against a perceived threat to free speech, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]