Marianne Williamson

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 29
9/6/2025, 4:56:46 PM
X
In reply to:
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
70d
Not until the second Trump administration - with a new breed of techno-fascists, white supremacists, and Christian nationalists - has an American government proactively empowered forces that unabashedly undermine that ideal. 3/4
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
70d
We have never fully actualized that ideal, but until the Trump administration there was at least the social consensus that we should try. Many struggled and died to make it so. 2/4
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
70d
The radicalism, exceptionalism, creativity and greatness of the United States has stemmed from the American ideal: that all of us were given by our Creator the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. 1/4

The statement suggests that there are forces within America aiming to destroy the country without using violence. It implies a significant threat to the nation's ideals and governance, aligning with the ongoing discussion about political and social dynamics in the United States. The tone is alarmist and suggests a deep concern for the country's future.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could incite fear or anxiety, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it could be interpreted as contributing to a divisive narrative. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on a perceived threat without offering solutions or dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it lacks specific examples or engagement with opposing views. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible, as it could contribute to polarization. [-1]