Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -109

The statement and images engage in public discourse by addressing societal issues related to mental health care, the role of the ACLU, and political stances on mandatory psychiatric care. The tone is critical and challenges current policies, suggesting that progressive approaches have contributed to urban crises.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement critiques policies and organizations, which could be seen as harmful to those who support these views, but it does not use harmful language.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but criticizes organizations, which could be seen as a form of public critique rather than harassment.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding of the author's perspective on mental health care policies, though it may not foster empathy for opposing views. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of the ACLU and progressive policies, which could be seen as constructive if it leads to dialogue, but it risks being perceived as an attack. [-1]