Michael Schellenberger

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of homelessness and public policy, specifically the debate over mandatory care for the mentally ill. It critiques the ACLU's stance and suggests a policy change.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to address a societal issue, potentially aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for solutions to homelessness. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It critiques the ACLU, which could be seen as a violation of respecting the dignity of others, depending on the tone and context. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement could promote understanding by highlighting a policy debate, but it may lack empathy if it doesn't consider the perspectives of those affected by mandatory care.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of the ACLU, which could be constructive if it fosters dialogue, but it risks being seen as a personal attack if not carefully framed. [-1]