Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -109

The statement involves a public figure's comment on a sensitive medical and social issue, which is part of public discourse. The tone is confrontational, highlighting a contradiction in the individual's past statements. The use of hyperbolic language ('jump off a bridge') could be seen as harmful or insensitive.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The hyperbolic language could be considered harmful or insensitive, especially regarding mental health. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement may not fully respect the dignity of the individual involved, as it publicly highlights a contradiction in a potentially embarrassing manner. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on exposing a contradiction. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of public shaming rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]