Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -109

The statement is a reaction to a conversation about a public figure's stance on pediatric gender medicine. It highlights a contradiction in the figure's previous statements and actions. The tone appears to be critical and possibly mocking, indicated by the use of 'SMH' (shaking my head).

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by mocking or belittling the individual involved, potentially affecting their reputation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual, as it publicly highlights a contradiction in a potentially mocking manner. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead focuses on a personal inconsistency, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]