Michael Schellenberger

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -120
9/18/2025, 2:38:50 PM
X
In reply to:
Martin Harsin
@MartinHarsin
·
121d
@shellenberger True, but if you say hateful and wrong things while working for a company, that holds and FCC license to not violate public interest, that company can choose to suspend or fire you. If he were saying these things on a platform he personally owned, it would be a different story.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
121d
The First Amendment protects our right to say hateful and wrong things and prohibits the government from infringing upon our ability to do so. The exceptions to this are extremely rare. This really shouldn’t be so hard to understand.
Nico Perrino
@NicoPerrino
·
121d
This is a 9-0 Supreme Court decision from just last year.

The conversation revolves around the First Amendment and the role of companies with FCC licenses in regulating speech. The initial statement by @shellenberger emphasizes the protection of free speech, while @MartinHarsin highlights the responsibilities of companies holding FCC licenses. The reply mentioning the FCC chair suggests a focus on regulatory perspectives. The discussion is rooted in public discourse about free speech, corporate responsibility, and government regulation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but engages in a discussion about regulatory responsibilities.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation maintains a respectful tone and engages in constructive dialogue about differing views on free speech and corporate responsibility. [+1]
  3. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to discuss important societal issues related to free speech and regulation. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by discussing the balance between individual rights and corporate responsibilities. [+1]