In reply to:
Jolly Roger
@JollyRogX
·
121d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
121d
The statement engages in a discussion about the implications of speech and its potential harms, referencing FCC regulations and First Amendment rights. It questions the extent of harm caused by speech, including emotional harm, in the context of legal and regulatory frameworks.
- The statement questions the nature of harm, which could be seen as exploring the boundaries of harm caused by speech. It does not directly cause harm but discusses its potential. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on regulatory and legal aspects rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By questioning the nature of harm, the statement could promote understanding of the complexities involved in free speech and its regulation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a dialogue about the implications of speech, which can be seen as constructive criticism of existing regulations and interpretations. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.