Marianne Williamson

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the comparison of a political figure to a historical dictator, which is a substantive engagement with public issues. The tone is critical and the intent is to express a strong opinion about the current administration, drawing historical parallels.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses strong language that could be considered harmful by comparing a political administration to the early Third Reich, which may not strive to do no harm. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the comparison to Hitler could be seen as disrespectful to those affected by the historical events. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses inflammatory comparisons rather than fostering dialogue. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to a strong historical comparison rather than addressing specific policies or actions. [-2]