Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -6
9/19/2025, 3:40:57 AM
X
In reply to:
K.I.S.S.
@35_bears
·
50d
@marwilliamson I respect your opinion. I disagree with the Hitler comparison. Please peruse that website. You could help a lot of your followers.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
50d
@35_bears I never would’ve called him Hitler during his first term. This administration however, is textbook early Third Reich whether somebody wants to look at it or not. And I never saw Charlie Kirk as a monster.
K.I.S.S.
@35_bears
·
50d
@marwilliamson I mean that trump has been called Hitler for a decade. He is forced to "fight" back. The left (I find you reasonable most of the time) is wrong about President Trump mostly due to ridiculous out of context videos and quotes. He is not a monster. Neither was Charlie Kirk. The left
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
50d
@35_bears Do you mean Trump?
K.I.S.S.
@35_bears
·
50d
@marwilliamson Please use your brain. Have some context. He has been called Hitler for a decade. One of his supporters just was murdered on camera. He is directionally correct. Don't be like the sheep.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
50d
"If the idea of free speech enrages you - the cornerstone of democratic self-government - than
I regret to inform you that you are a fascist."
-- Stephen Miller on twitter, April 2022 2/

The statement is part of a public discourse involving a discussion on political figures and historical comparisons, specifically referencing Trump and Hitler. The tone is respectful and seeks to engage in a constructive dialogue by suggesting mutual exploration of resources to understand each other's perspectives better.

  1. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by suggesting a mutual exchange of resources to better understand each other's viewpoints, which aligns well with the principle. [+2]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of respectful discourse. [+2]