Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -6
9/19/2025, 3:41:51 AM
X
In reply to:
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
50d
@35_bears I appreciate our respectful conversation, but this isn’t about opinion. You say you disagree with the Hitler comparison, but based on what actual reading of history? I agree to look at that website if you’ll check out FASCISM: A Warning, by M. Albright
K.I.S.S.
@35_bears
·
50d
@marwilliamson I respect your opinion. I disagree with the Hitler comparison. Please peruse that website. You could help a lot of your followers.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
50d
@35_bears I never would’ve called him Hitler during his first term. This administration however, is textbook early Third Reich whether somebody wants to look at it or not. And I never saw Charlie Kirk as a monster.
K.I.S.S.
@35_bears
·
50d
@marwilliamson I mean that trump has been called Hitler for a decade. He is forced to "fight" back. The left (I find you reasonable most of the time) is wrong about President Trump mostly due to ridiculous out of context videos and quotes. He is not a monster. Neither was Charlie Kirk. The left
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
50d
@35_bears Do you mean Trump?
K.I.S.S.
@35_bears
·
50d
@marwilliamson Please use your brain. Have some context. He has been called Hitler for a decade. One of his supporters just was murdered on camera. He is directionally correct. Don't be like the sheep.

The statement is part of a broader conversation about political figures and historical comparisons, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is inquisitive, seeking clarification on the term 'directionally correct,' which suggests a desire for understanding rather than confrontation.

  1. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement seeks clarification, which can promote understanding and empathy by encouraging a deeper exploration of the topic. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the content of the discussion. [+1]