Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement suggests a conspiracy theory by implying that a speech by Barack Obama was part of an orchestrated effort to influence government policy on online censorship. It raises concerns about government actions and the influence of public figures, which are public issues.
- The statement implies a negative intent by suggesting a conspiracy, which could harm public trust without evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it could indirectly harm the dignity of those involved by suggesting malicious intent without proof. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it suggests a conspiracy without providing evidence, which could mislead rather than inform. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism, as it implies wrongdoing without engaging with the actual content of the speech or the policy. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to suggest a conspiracy, which could be seen as irresponsible if not backed by evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.