Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -120

The statement is a supportive reply to a conversation about U.S. Treasury sanctions against individuals associated with Alexandre de Moraes, a Brazilian Supreme Federal Court justice. The original conversation involves serious allegations of censorship and politicized actions, which are public issues. The reply uses emojis to express approval and support for the actions taken by the U.S. Treasury.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but supports actions that could be seen as controversial, depending on one's perspective on the sanctions.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does indirectly support actions against specific individuals.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a simple expression of support without further explanation or dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it merely expresses approval without addressing the complexities of the situation. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to support a governmental action, which could be seen as contributing to public discourse, but it lacks depth in addressing the broader implications.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion, but it does not provide a responsible or nuanced discussion of the issues at hand.