Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -98
9/27/2025, 1:30:23 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
109d
And after the government combines your personal, banking, and voting data under a single digital ID, it will add social media and vaccine information. Same with Real ID in the US. The Censorship Industrial Complex was dress rehearsal for digital ID.
Silkie Carlo
@silkiecarlo
·
109d
It only took until 4pm for the Govt to say "in time" the mandatory biometric digital ID will be used for renting, benefits, banking, age ID, nurseries, education, even voting....

These uses will not (initially?) be mandatory but likely will be made so after future moral panics

The statement is a critical response to Google's involvement in digital ID initiatives, expressing concern over potential privacy and control issues. The tone is accusatory and confrontational, suggesting a fear of authoritarian control.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially inciting fear without constructive dialogue. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals or entities involved, using terms like 'creepy totalitarianism.' [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead focusing on a negative portrayal without offering solutions. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement lacks constructive criticism and engages in a personal attack on the individuals mentioned. [-2]