In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
109d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
109d
The statement is part of a public discourse on the implementation of digital IDs in the UK. It expresses opposition to digital IDs, urging action to prevent their adoption. The tone is urgent and critical, suggesting potential negative consequences if digital IDs are implemented.
- The statement aims to prevent harm by opposing digital IDs, which the author believes could have negative consequences. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but uses strong language to criticize the digital ID proposal. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the opposition's perspective on digital IDs, though it could be more balanced.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but could benefit from more constructive dialogue with those in favor of digital IDs. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.