Michael Schellenberger

The statement is part of a broader discussion on digital IDs, involving concerns about privacy, government control, and political influence. It questions the motivations behind political figures and organizations supporting digital IDs, suggesting a lack of transparency and potential manipulation.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement implies harm by suggesting manipulation and control by political figures, which could incite distrust. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It questions the privacy and dignity of individuals by implying they are controlled by others without evidence. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering suspicion and division. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead using accusatory language without substantiated claims. [-1]