Michael Schellenberger

The statement critiques a survey conducted by the Tony Blair Institute, suggesting that the survey's methodology was manipulative by priming respondents to feel inconvenienced without digital IDs. The tone is accusatory and skeptical, aiming to question the validity of the survey results.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to expose perceived manipulation, which could be seen as striving to prevent harm by questioning potentially misleading practices. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in harassment or hate speech but criticizes the methodology of a survey. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes skepticism and critical thinking about survey methodologies, which can foster understanding and awareness. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of the survey's methodology but does not attack individuals personally. [+1]