Michael Schellenberger

The statement critiques the idea of a government app for public services, suggesting skepticism about digital IDs. It implies that the term 'digital ID' is avoided due to negative connotations, indicating distrust in the government's intentions. The tone is sarcastic and critical, reflecting concerns about privacy and manipulation in public policy.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement raises concerns about potential harm from digital IDs, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy concerns by highlighting potential issues with digital IDs, aligning with the principle of respecting privacy. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The sarcastic tone may not promote understanding or empathy, slightly misaligning with this principle. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of government actions, which can be constructive, but the sarcastic tone may detract from constructive dialogue. [-1]