Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -98
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
108d

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the use of digital technology in managing asylum seekers and UK borders, a significant public policy issue. It suggests that migration is a complex issue that transcends traditional political divisions, implying a strategic understanding of its impact.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a strategic manipulation of political issues, which could be seen as undermining trust. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in terms of political strategy rather than human impact. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it focuses on political maneuvering rather than solutions or understanding. [-1]