Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -98
9/28/2025, 5:52:33 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
105d
From a Swiss source: "Palantir and Mercator sponsored the Yes Campaign. Palantir is a member of Digital Switzerland, alongside other tech companies. Digital Switzerland lobbied for the E-ID/digital ID in Switzerland in this vote.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
105d
The deep state swamp creatures know that digital IDs are unpopular and so they are trying to rush them through before anyone realizes what they are doing. The good news is that the more people learn about them the more alarmed they become.

Polling in Switzerland showed 60%
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
105d
Good god. The Swiss people just approved digital IDs. Australia implemented them in Dec. UK last week. In all 3 nations, deep state-allied politicians are behind them. This is a digital ID/censorship emergency. Please share and reply below with info about other nations.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
106d
Everybody needs a digital ID, say heads of state and high-tech leaders. They give many reasons: it will stop illegal migration; it will increase efficiency; it will protect privacy; and it will prevent online fraud and data ransoming.

But we don’t need digital IDs for any of

The statement accuses the Mercator foundation of corrupting Digital Society Switzerland by implying that their financial support influenced the NGO's stance on digital IDs. The tone is accusatory and suggests unethical behavior without providing concrete evidence. This could potentially harm reputations and spread misinformation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by making unsubstantiated claims of corruption, which could damage reputations. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the privacy and dignity of the organizations involved, as it accuses them of unethical behavior without clear evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead makes a personal attack on the integrity of the organizations. [-2]