Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -98
In reply to:

The statement discusses Palantir's strategic decision to establish a hub in Switzerland, potentially to access the EU market while avoiding EU regulations. This is part of a broader conversation about digital IDs and corporate influence in policy-making, touching on issues of governance, privacy, and corporate ethics.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implies potential harm by suggesting regulatory avoidance, which could undermine trust in corporate practices. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy but raises concerns about corporate influence on public policy, which could affect public trust. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of corporate strategies and their implications for regulation. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the motives behind corporate decisions and their impact on public policy. [+1]