Michael Schellenberger

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of digital IDs, surveillance, and the influence of corporations and NGOs on public policy. It raises concerns about privacy, government transparency, and corporate influence.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement suggests potential harm from digital IDs and surveillance, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by raising awareness. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It questions the integrity of organizations and governments, potentially violating the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement aims to promote understanding of the issues surrounding digital IDs, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of politicians and organizations, which could be seen as constructive but also borders on personal attacks. [-1]