Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -98
In reply to:

The statement expresses a strong opinion against digital IDs, suggesting a coordinated effort by organizations to enforce them. It implies a conspiracy involving censorship and control, which can incite fear and distrust.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by spreading fear and distrust without evidence. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the privacy and dignity of the organizations mentioned, implying malicious intent without substantiation. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on alarmist rhetoric rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It does not engage in constructive criticism, instead using accusatory language and conspiracy theories. [-2]