Michael Schellenberger

The statement critiques the unilateral decision by a political leader regarding digital IDs, suggesting it may be a strategic move to make voluntary IDs seem more acceptable. It implies a lack of democratic process and raises concerns about potential manipulation.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement raises concerns about potential harm from digital IDs, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy by highlighting the lack of public approval for digital IDs, aligning with the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by discussing the implications of digital ID policies, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It engages in constructive criticism of political actions, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]