Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
104d
The statement critiques the implementation of digital IDs, suggesting they are unnecessary for stopping illegal migration and implying they are part of a broader surveillance agenda. It uses a dismissive tone, comparing a public figure's explanation to 'word salad' and suggesting manipulation ('gas-lighting'). The statement is part of a larger discourse on privacy, surveillance, and government policy.
- The statement uses a dismissive tone and implies manipulation, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the integrity of public figures, potentially affecting their dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement raises concerns about privacy and surveillance, which can promote understanding of these issues. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement uses a dismissive tone and personal attacks, which do not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.