Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -111

The statement critiques a political figure's stance on digital IDs, suggesting ulterior motives and manipulation. It uses sarcasm and implies dishonesty, aiming to provoke skepticism about digital ID policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by implying deceit without evidence, potentially misleading the public. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of the individuals involved, using sarcasm and implying dishonesty. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering distrust. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in personal attacks rather than constructive dialogue, undermining the credibility of the political figure. [-2]