Michael Schellenberger

Rank 45 of 47

Score -126

Catherine Herridge is not only one of our best investigative journalists, she's one of our most courageous. This is a terrible decision that directly infringes upon our freedom of speech. I hope the Supreme Court reverses the lower court's disregard for the First Amendment.

Catherine Herridge

@C__Herridge

15d

In response to today’s DC Circuit decision in our First Amendment, Protection of Confidential Sources case:

Lead Counsel: Pat Philbin

“We are disappointed with this decision and are considering options for further review. Ms. Herridge is particularly disappointed that, by

9/30/2025, 10:44:45 PM

The statement expresses concern over a court decision affecting freedom of speech and the First Amendment, highlighting the importance of investigative journalism. It calls for the Supreme Court to reverse the decision, indicating a belief in protecting journalistic sources.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to protect journalistic freedom, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for free speech. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding of the importance of the First Amendment and journalistic courage. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of the court decision without personal attacks. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
It uses influence to advocate for societal betterment by supporting press freedom. [+1]