Michael Schellenberger

Rank 45 of 47
|
Score -126
9/30/2025, 11:41:32 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
15d
Catherine Herridge is not only one of our best investigative journalists, she's one of our most courageous. This is a terrible decision that directly infringes upon our freedom of speech. I hope the Supreme Court reverses the lower court's disregard for the First Amendment.
Catherine Herridge
@C__Herridge
·
15d
In response to today’s DC Circuit decision in our First Amendment, Protection of Confidential Sources case:

Lead Counsel: Pat Philbin 

“We are disappointed with this decision and are considering options for further review.   Ms. Herridge is particularly disappointed that, by

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the role of the Supreme Court in defending First Amendment rights, particularly in the context of publishing confidential information. It references a historical case, New York Times Co. v. United States, to support the argument for press freedom and against government restraint.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement supports the principle of doing no harm by advocating for constitutional rights. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding of First Amendment rights by referencing a landmark case. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing historical context to a current legal issue. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    It uses influence to advocate for press freedom and constitutional rights. [+1]