In reply to:
Vanni Bombonato
@vannibombonato
·
11d
The statement is part of a conversation discussing the economic implications of investing in a potentially unreliable technology, which constitutes public discourse as it addresses public concerns about economic policy and technological investment.
- The statement uses a dismissive tone with the shrugging emoji, which could be seen as trivializing the concern, slightly violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it provide a substantive counterargument, which slightly violates the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses a public platform to engage in a discussion about economic policy, but does so in a way that lacks depth and responsibility, slightly violating the principle of using the platform responsibly. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.