In reply to:
The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning the economic implications of investing in a particular technology. The original statement by @GaryMarcus critiques the reliance on an unproven technology, which is a substantive engagement with economic policy and technological investment.
- The statement by @mikecnicholson suggests reading @edzitron’s analyses, which promotes understanding and encourages further exploration of the topic, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. Instead, it suggests a constructive approach by recommending further reading, which aligns with engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By suggesting further reading, the statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to encourage informed discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.