Cecílie Jílková
@CecilieJilkova
·
11d
The statement criticizes a Czech intelligence agency for allegedly spreading alarm about 'pro-Russian' accounts on TikTok and accuses a pro-censorship leader of overreacting. The tone is confrontational and suggests a bias against censorship and intelligence activities. The conversation involves accusations of plagiarism and lack of clarity in reporting, indicating a contentious debate over media integrity and freedom of speech.
- The statement and conversation involve criticism and accusations, which could potentially harm reputations, thus not fully adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but engages in a public dispute, which could be seen as disrespectful to the individuals involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is more focused on criticism and proving a point. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The conversation involves personal attacks and dismissive language, which does not align with constructive criticism and dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.