Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
13d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
11d
Cecílie Jílková
@CecilieJilkova
·
11d
The statement supports investigative journalism and criticizes intelligence agencies for potentially misleading actions. It suggests that following the journalist will ensure her safety, implying a threat to her due to her work. The tone is supportive of the journalist but critical of the intelligence community.
- The statement aims to prevent harm by exposing potential misinformation from intelligence agencies. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the journalist's work but implies a threat to her safety, which could be seen as a violation of her privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the journalist's work and the potential misuse of intelligence. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of the intelligence community without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.