Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -6
10/11/2025, 4:18:58 AM
X
In reply to:
Terrance MacGregor
@tamacgregor
·
35d
@marwilliamson Using "fascist" again @marwilliamson! Oh dear. I thought you said you were going to tone down your language!
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
35d
Watching videos of ICE agents detaining and throwing to the ground legitimate news journalist simply doing their job, I’m mindful of how many of these agents are not even trained law-enforcement officers.
They’re simply men who answered an ad and were put directly onto the

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with a discussion on the use of language in political commentary, specifically the use of the term 'fascist' by a public figure. The conversation touches on issues of language, tone, and the responsibilities of public figures in discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement 'it’s not a judgment, it’s a description' attempts to clarify the intent behind using a potentially harmful term, suggesting a neutral stance. However, it does not directly address the potential harm of the language used.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It focuses on defending the use of language rather than fostering a deeper dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by responding to a critique, but it does not provide constructive criticism or further the conversation in a meaningful way. It defends a position without addressing the concerns raised. [-1]