Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -6
10/11/2025, 4:19:34 AM
X
In reply to:
enslaved1s
@enslaved1s
·
35d
@marwilliamson This wouldn't happen if you idiots didnt let all the retarded criminals in.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
35d
Watching videos of ICE agents detaining and throwing to the ground legitimate news journalist simply doing their job, I’m mindful of how many of these agents are not even trained law-enforcement officers.
They’re simply men who answered an ad and were put directly onto the

The statement is a sarcastic response to a previous comment that blames a group for allowing 'retarded criminals' in, which itself is a reply to a critique of ICE agents' actions. The tone is confrontational and implies a comparison between the blame-shifting in domestic abuse and the blame placed on a group for immigration issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses a metaphor related to domestic abuse, which could be seen as harmful or insensitive, thus violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The use of the term 'retarded criminals' in the original comment is derogatory and disrespectful, and the reply does not address this but instead uses a potentially harmful analogy, failing to respect dignity. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather uses a sarcastic analogy, which could be seen as a personal attack or an ad hominem argument. [-2]