Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -6
10/13/2025, 2:29:49 AM
X
In reply to:
Bill Zettler
@twitbzed
·
32d
@marwilliamson "Purification" is what Israel is doing to Gaza. The word itself isn't evil, but it's certainly been used regularly in its service.

But thank you for taking my suggestion seriously. I think many of your readers will also blanch at the word's use.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
32d
@twitbzed In ACIM it says “miracles are everyone’s right, but purification is necessary first.” Purifying our hearts of fear and lovelessness. thanks for the suggestion, but I’ll stick with what I wrote.
Bill Zettler
@twitbzed
·
33d
@marwilliamson "Purification of the American heart is the key to our worldly salvation"

Apologies, Marianne, but you desperately need an editor. This is the most appalling, ominous, Hitleresque phrasing I've heard in decades. Even Trump or Stalin would never say it. It's not a good look for
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
33d
The spiritual solution to the threat of fascism..
https://www.transformarticles.co…

The statement 'Israel has not said that' is a direct response to a claim made about Israel's actions in Gaza. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a contentious public issue involving international relations and human rights. The tone is corrective, aiming to clarify or refute a previous assertion.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, as it is a factual correction.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by not engaging in hate speech or harassment.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a simple refutation without further explanation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by addressing a specific claim, but it does not provide constructive criticism or further context to foster understanding. [-1]