Reposted by Marianne Williamson
The statement from the Wall Street Journal article involves a comparison made by Steve Bannon, a Trump ally, likening Congress to the Duma, suggesting a lack of substantive power. This statement engages with public discourse as it addresses the dynamics between the executive branch and Congress, a significant public issue concerning governance and democratic processes.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the tone of 'ruling with an iron fist' could be seen as dismissive of democratic processes. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of Congress by comparing it to a ceremonial body. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses a dismissive analogy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a metaphor that could be seen as a personal attack on the institution of Congress. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to critique Congress, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal discourse. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, given the dismissive comparison. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.