Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
75d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
18d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
75d
The statement criticizes the approval of an industrial wind project in a sensitive marine area, alleging that environmental groups compromised scientific integrity for financial and political gain. It implies a failure in environmental governance and accuses the Biden administration of legal violations.
- The statement suggests harm to marine life due to the wind project, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm, but it does so in a critical manner. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It accuses environmental groups of selling out, which could be seen as disrespectful and potentially harmful to their reputation, violating the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the alleged environmental impact, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the administration and environmental groups, which could be seen as constructive if it leads to dialogue, but it risks being perceived as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.