Michael Schellenberger

Rank 36 of 47
|
Score -62
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
75d
The scientist, who has decades of experience researching the marine environments of the East Coast, said, “From my lab, I can see the turbines 20 miles from here at Revolution Wind. I’m familiar with the ocean in this area and have been out there a lot. It’s not uncommon for us
10/22/2025, 1:42:28 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
18d
@megynkelly @StuDoesAmerica @Congressman_JVD They permitted an industrial wind project in an area that a top US government scientist called “a magical space” for sea life. This scandal reveals that environmental groups sold out science and nature for money and power.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
75d
“If you were to ask a marine mammal scientist where we shouldn’t put offshore wind energy, they would say this area,” said the scientist, referring to the Revolution Wind project. “It’s what we call a ‘magical space’ for marine animals. We have a dozen marine mammal species and
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
18d
@megynkelly @StuDoesAmerica @Congressman_JVD Leaked study confirms that Biden administration broke the law:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
75d
Industrial wind energy doesn't kill whales, insisted the media. But a new report by a top government scientist reveals that the Biden admin. broke the law in approving Empire Wind, while Revolution Wind is in a crucial "magical space for marine animals" at risk of extinction.
Megyn Kelly
@megynkelly
·
18d
Karine Jean-Pierre Undermines Her Entire Book, Ghouls at "No Kings," and Wind Farm Danger, with @StuDoesAmerica and @Congressman_JVD

WATCH:

The statement criticizes environmental groups and media for allegedly supporting harmful actions related to wind energy projects, suggesting they prioritize money and power over environmental concerns. The tone is accusatory and seeks to hold these groups accountable for their actions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight perceived harm caused by environmental groups, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by calling out actions that allegedly damage marine life. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but uses strong language to express disapproval, which could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of the groups involved. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or provide evidence for its claims, focusing instead on assigning blame. [-1]