Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement critiques Bill Gates' past approach to climate change communication, labeling it as 'fearmongering' and suggesting it had negative impacts. It acknowledges a shift towards 'common sense' but emphasizes past harm.
- The statement suggests harm was done by past climate communication strategies, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It criticizes past actions without engaging in personal attacks, maintaining a level of respect. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging a shift in approach, but it could be more empathetic towards differing views.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism but could be seen as harsh in its language.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.