In reply to:
Walter Kirn
@walterkirn
·
7d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
7d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing alleged global internet censorship and the involvement of influential figures and institutions. It implies a lack of transparency and potential manipulation of public policy by elites.
- The statement suggests harm by implying secretive control over public policy, which could incite distrust. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It challenges the privacy and dignity of those involved by suggesting secretive and potentially unethical behavior. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering suspicion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead making accusatory claims without evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.