Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -71
10/29/2025, 10:38:44 AM
X
In reply to:
Lara Logan
@laralogan
·
7d
Michael, you have reported on this for a long time. I know because it was like therapy when I found & followed your work - thank you for being a solid, consistent voice on the insanity of the climate scam/hoax which is a globalist operation to control us - from the food supply to
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
9d
For decades, top scientists said climate change threatened civilization. But the data never showed that. And now, the evidence is overwhelming that scientists and the media deliberately misled the public on fires, ice, food, floods, heat, islands, coral, sea level, & hurricanes.

The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing climate change and its portrayal by scientists and the media. The tone is critical and suggests a conspiracy to mislead the public. The conversation questions the integrity of scientific communication and media reporting on climate change.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading misinformation or undermining trust in scientific consensus. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of scientists and media professionals, implying deliberate deception without evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue as a 'scam' or 'hoax.' [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement lacks constructive criticism and engages in personal attacks by accusing scientists and media of deliberate misinformation. [-2]