Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47

Score -71

Reposted by Michael Shellenberger

-8

Michael, you have reported on this for a long time. I know because it was like therapy when I found & followed your work - thank you for being a solid, consistent voice on the insanity of the climate scam/hoax which is a globalist operation to control us - from the food supply to

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

For decades, top scientists said climate change threatened civilization. But the data never showed that. And now, the evidence is overwhelming that scientists and the media deliberately misled the public on fires, ice, food, floods, heat, islands, coral, sea level, & hurricanes.

10/29/2025, 6:25:15 AM

The statement expresses gratitude towards a journalist for their work on climate change, framing it as a 'scam/hoax' and a 'globalist operation.' It aligns with a broader narrative questioning the credibility of climate science and media reporting. The tone is conspiratorial and dismissive of mainstream scientific consensus.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading misinformation about climate change. [-2]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It lacks respect for the privacy and dignity of scientists and journalists, implying deceit and manipulation. [-2]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering division and skepticism. [-2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
It does not engage in constructive criticism, instead making broad accusations without evidence. [-2]