Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
7d
The statement and accompanying conversation suggest a secretive and potentially conspiratorial meeting aimed at global internet censorship. The tone is skeptical and critical, implying a lack of transparency and potential overreach by influential figures and governments.
- The statement implies harm by suggesting a conspiracy to control information, which could incite fear or distrust. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It challenges the privacy and dignity of those involved by suggesting secretive and possibly unethical behavior. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering suspicion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead presenting a one-sided view without evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness of potential issues but does so in a way that may not be responsible or balanced.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.