Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
6d
The statement raises concerns about alleged global censorship efforts involving multiple countries and institutions. It questions the actions of Australia's eSafety commissioner and references a report about a secret meeting at Stanford. The tone is accusatory and seeks accountability from public officials.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified claims, which may incite fear or distrust. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the actions of public officials, which is within the realm of public discourse, but it should ensure accuracy to respect privacy and dignity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on accusations. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it presents allegations without offering a platform for response or discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness of a potential issue, which could be seen as using influence for societal betterment if the claims are accurate. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It challenges censorship, aligning with free speech principles, but must ensure responsible use of information. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.