Senator Matt Canavan
@mattjcan
·
5d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
5d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
6d
The statement raises concerns about global censorship efforts allegedly coordinated by various international entities, including Australia's eSafety Commissioner. It questions the transparency and legality of these actions, suggesting they may infringe on free speech rights.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by censorship, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the actions of a public official, which could be seen as a challenge to their privacy and dignity, but is relevant to public accountability. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement seeks to promote understanding of the issue, though it may lack empathy towards the individuals involved.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism of the eSafety Commissioner and related entities, which could be seen as constructive if it leads to dialogue and accountability. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a significant public issue, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It upholds free speech by questioning actions perceived as censorship, aligning with the principle of responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.