Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement addresses concerns about the actions of an eSafety Commissioner, suggesting overreach and potential impact on First Amendment rights, which are public issues.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm caused by the Commissioner's actions, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but could be seen as critical of the Commissioner, which may border on personal attack if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement invites dialogue on the Commissioner's actions, aligning with constructive criticism but lacks specific evidence or context. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.