Ilhan Omar

Rank 12 of 47

Score 96

-3

@sigma_47 @peoplepowerpod1 @OmarFatehMN @GovTimWalz Jacob has deeper ties to the community you are speaking of than omar does. I don’t understand why you don’t care about the fact that more of them gave Frey money? Why is that if Omar somehow rep them?

11/2/2025, 1:47:32 AM

In reply to:

jDogg

@sigma_47

@IlhanMN @peoplepowerpod1 The reason they mention @OmarFatehMN is bc he's a leader in a relatively small'ish community that is responsible for a vast disproportion of the MDE and MDH fraud to date. @GovTimWalz seems assured that "leaders in the community" knew there was fraud and didn't say anything.

Ilhan Omar

@IlhanMN

@peoplepowerpod1 Frey is also the only one who had someone in his office convicted of fraud and has a spouse who worked for the law firm defending the fraud. The only reason they keep mentioning Omar, is because he is Somali and it’s disgusting.

peoplepowerpodcast

@peoplepowerpod1

"Swimming in fraud" is a hell of a statement from Jacob Frey's surrogates considering the mayor's "closest friend" Jonathan Weinhagen, who Frey tried to make the shadow mayor, was federally indicted last week for fraud & embezzlement with a scheme that makes mobsters envious

Joe Radinovich

@joeradinovich

Not sure I’ve seen literally any money spent telling voters he’s too young or idealistic. Seen a fair amount spent saying he’s lied about his past positions and is swimming in fraud and ethics issues.

The statement engages in a discussion about community ties and political contributions, questioning the motivations behind political support and representation. It implies a critique of perceived biases in political discourse.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement questions motivations and implies bias, which could contribute to divisiveness rather than understanding. [-1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It does not engage in direct harassment but could be seen as dismissive of certain community ties. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement questions motives but does not engage in personal attacks.