Ilhan Omar

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 96
11/2/2025, 1:51:31 AM
X
In reply to:
Darwin Forsyth
@darwinforsyth
·
6d
@IlhanMN I think the millions of dollars to yourself and your husband materialized on your campaign finance reports but please continue with this vibe https://x.com/darwinforsyth/stat…
Ilhan Omar
@IlhanMN
·
6d
@darwinforsyth The only one with actual tries to fraud is Frey, all the other stuff you all try with me or Omar has no proof. I find it interesting that his best friend and shadow mayor goes to jail and no article mentions their relationship, also his advisor ran a fraudulent company out of the
Darwin Forsyth
@darwinforsyth
·
6d
@IlhanMN Frey fired that staffer immediately, and your attack on his wife is inaccurate and ironic given how you made yourself & your husband millionaires using your campaign dollars. Fateh authored a bill to fast track approvals for a program riddled with fraud, one his wife has ties to.
Ilhan Omar
@IlhanMN
·
6d
@peoplepowerpod1 Frey is also the only one who had someone in his office convicted of fraud and has a spouse who worked for the law firm defending the fraud. The only reason they keep mentioning Omar, is because he is Somali and it’s disgusting.
peoplepowerpodcast
@peoplepowerpod1
·
7d
"Swimming in fraud" is a hell of a statement from Jacob Frey's surrogates considering the mayor's "closest friend" Jonathan Weinhagen, who Frey tried to make the shadow mayor, was federally indicted last week for fraud & embezzlement with a scheme that makes mobsters envious
Joe Radinovich
@joeradinovich
·
8d
Not sure I’ve seen literally any money spent telling voters he’s too young or idealistic. Seen a fair amount spent saying he’s lied about his past positions and is swimming in fraud and ethics issues.

The statement is sarcastic and dismissive, responding to an accusation with irony. It does not engage constructively with the issue of campaign finance and instead deflects with a personal retort.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses sarcasm, which can be seen as dismissive rather than promoting understanding. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The sarcastic tone does not respect the dignity of the person being addressed. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses irony to deflect criticism. [-1]